![]() ![]() Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act says that websites and platforms like Facebook, Google, Twitter - none of them can be held liable for illegal content posted online by their users. So maybe flesh it out for us, Dean.ĭean: It's complicated, but it's essence we can talk about that. But none of them really know what it is.Īmory: Yeah. And then, I feel like on the Democratic end, people have also talked about it. Senator Josh Hawley has talked a lot about it. It offers some sort of protection for websites, I'm guessing.īen: But it's also this oddly shaped political football where I feel like Trump has talked about it in ways that don't make sense. In other words, Google aided and abetted the murder of Nohemi Gonzalez.ĭean: But there's this one law that protects companies like Google from these sorts of claims. ![]() It was hosting and disseminating terrorist agitprop. ISIS killed 130 people, including 23-year-old college student Nohemi Gonzalez.ĭean: The Gonzalez family claimed that Google's subsidiary, YouTube, used its algorithm that promoted ISIS recruitment videos. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court.]ĭean: So, back in 2015, Paris saw a string of terror attacks. [Chief Justice John Roberts: We'll hear argument this morning in Case 21-1333, Gonzalez vs. This episode deals with sexual harassment and abuse.ĭean: This is the story of what happens when nine people between the ages of 50 and 74 decide the fate of the internet.ĭean: In February, I heard about this one case at the Supreme Court. music, sound effects, tone) are harder to translate to text.Īmory Sivertson: Hey, everyone. The transcript has been edited from our original script for clarity. This content was originally created for audio. Everyone who makes a monthly donation will get access to exclusive bonus content. If you want that too, we would deeply appreciate your contribution to our work in any amount. We love making Endless Thread, and we want to be able to keep making it far into the future. " Section 230, the internet law that’s under threat, explained" by Sara Morrison (Vox, 2023)." The Deepfake Defense - Exploring the Limits of the Law and Ethical Norms in Protecting Legal Proceedings from Lying Lawyers" by Rebecca Delfino (Ohio State Law Journal, 2023)." Pornographic Deepfakes: The Case for Federal Criminalization of Revenge Porn’s Next Tragic Act" by Rebecca Delfino (Fordham Law Review, 2019).The faker: Deepfakes, lies, and cheerleading ( Endless Thread, 2022).Mixer and sound designer: Emily Jankowski Show producers: Samata Joshi, Nora Saks, Grace Tatter, and Quincy Walters. ![]() Credits:Ĭo-hosts: Amory Sivertson and Ben Brock Johnson A lawsuit is also unlikely to stand up in civil court.Įndless Thread co-hosts Amory Sivertson and Ben Brock Johnson speak with producer Dean Russell about deepfake law and the movement for change. Using someone's image without their consent to create porn can have damaging effects, emotionally and physically.īut no federal law criminalizes the creation or sharing of non-consensual deepfake porn in the United States. More than 90 percent of deepfakes are porn, according to the research company Sensity AI. Since the creation of deepfakes in 2017, the AI-powered technology that swaps faces into videos has become commonplace, particularly in pornography. (Photo Illustration by Adrien Fillon/NurPhoto via Getty Images) ![]() Facebook Email Pornhub blurred home page. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |